Best Hyperliquid vaults this week
A July 20, 2026 VaultVision screen: eight open vaults passed verified-data, TVL, risk-score, and 30-day drawdown filters.
Checked against VaultVision's risk-adjusted ranking API and the vault registry generated at 14:43:36 UTC on July 20, 2026. The screen requires full-confidence data, deposits open, TVL of at least $300K, risk score at or below 60, and 30-day max drawdown at or below 10%.
Eight vaults that passed the screen
Rows with a verified-top rank keep that order; clean but unranked benchmarks follow. A pass means the vault cleared the stated filters at the checked time. It does not mean the strategy is safe, the current position book is suitable, or the entry remains good.
| # | Vault | TVL | APR | DD | Risk | Entry | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Systemic Strategies L/S Grids | $6.57M | +180.7% | 8.8% | 53 | Good 70 | Highest verified-top rank among the eight; still requires a position-level read. |
| 2 | Satori Quantum HF Vault | $513K | +81.0% | 3.4% | 40 | Good 70 | Lower drawdown and moderate risk, with deposits open at the check. |
| 3 | DOUBLETOP Vault | $793K | +37.4% | 4.6% | 50 | Neutral 58 | Clears the risk and drawdown gates, but entry quality is neutral. |
| 4 | Citadel | $571K | +19.5% | 2.1% | 35 | Good 70 | Low drawdown and good entry score under the current model inputs. |
| 5 | AIQuantPulse | $1.53M | +14.1% | 5.9% | 42 | Neutral 60 | Useful mid-risk benchmark; the entry signal is not a green light. |
| 6 | FC Genesis - Quantum | $2.17M | -0.5% | 0.9% | 22 | Neutral 45 | Lowest risk score in the screen, but recent APR was slightly negative. |
| 7 | Equinox · Blackalgo | $1.05M | 0.0% | 2.5% | 35 | Neutral 60 | Low drawdown, but no positive APR case at the captured snapshot. |
| 8 | Long HYPE | Short Garbage | $509K | -6.1% | 2.5% | 46 | Neutral 43 | Passes risk mechanics, but negative APR and weak entry keep it observation-only. |
All values are rounded from the July 20 API snapshot. Open the vault page to check current positions, flows, deposit status, and whether the data changed after publication.
How to read this screen
Start with data confidence, deposit status, risk, and drawdown, then use APR as context. Systemic has the loudest return in this set, but Satori and Citadel have lower captured drawdown. FC Genesis shows the opposite lesson: a low risk score does not create a positive-return case.
For HLP alternatives, keep the protocol vault as the benchmark and compare user vaults by TVL, risk, and drawdown on the HLP alternatives page. For copy-style research, use manual mirror scanner; VaultVision does not promise automated copy trading from this article.
Use the scanner before the story wins
Every row above has a live detail page with current positions, risk score, flow context, and CTA tracking. The article is a map; the product is where you decide whether the map is still valid.
Why obvious leaderboard names were excluded
The raw risk-adjusted endpoint can still place extreme-return names near the top. The July 20 registry marked its rank-one row as below the confidence threshold, with risk 75 and 30-day drawdown near 30.1%, so it fails this article's screen. Growi HF had strong TVL and lower risk, but deposits were not open under the current capacity rule. Realist Capital had good entry quality but risk 64, above the screen's ceiling.
Practical checklist before depositing
- Open the vault page. Use the live detail page, not a static article, before acting.
- Check drawdown first. A high APR vault with a 20-30% recent drawdown is a different risk than a vault with a 2-5% drawdown.
- Watch flow. Outflows can matter more than the last APR print.
- Use alerts. If the setup is interesting but early, add it to a watchlist instead of forcing a deposit.
- Do not confuse manual mirror research with automation. VaultVision helps you inspect leader behavior; it is not promising automated copy execution here.
Related product pages
- Hyperliquid vault rankings - live TVL, APR, returns, drawdown, and risk.
- Hyperliquid vault risk scanner - risk-first screen for conservative filtering.
- Hyperliquid vault drawdown - compare recent max drawdown before chasing yield.
- Hyperliquid vault alerts - watch candidates before deposit timing is clean.
- Hyperliquid vault TVL - check crowding and capacity before you move.
- HLP alternatives - compare non-HLP leader vaults against the benchmark.
- Systemic Strategies L/S Grids - first row in this dated mechanical screen.
- Satori Quantum HF Vault - lower-drawdown follow-up.
- Citadel - another low-drawdown row to inspect.
Data source and limits
- Checked against the risk-adjusted API and vault registry API generated July 20, 2026 at 14:43:36 UTC.
- Fields used: `meets_confidence_threshold`, `accepts_deposits`, `tvl_usd`, `apr`, `risk_score`, `entry_label`, `entry_score`, and `risk_reasons.max_drawdown_30d`.
- Screen: confidence required, deposits open, TVL at least $300K, risk at most 60, and 30-day drawdown at most 10%.
- Numbers are rounded for readability. Live product pages may already differ after the next API refresh.
- This is not financial advice. Hyperliquid vaults can lose money, and past performance does not guarantee future returns.